Recycling Product News Logo

Tire evaluations for fleets -- test to get the best

Company info

701 Lima Avenue
Findlay, OH
US, 45840


Read more

We’ve all heard the adage: “You get what you pay for.” In many cases that’s true. Yet, when it comes to the tires in your fleet, it may not be the case. With tires, you can actually get more than you pay for, and if you do, you’re cutting operational costs significantly since tires often represent the second highest expense following fuel.

Tires constantly evolve and applications vary. They are far from a commodity item, and tire price points don’t always tell you the “life” you should expect to get from them. Just because you pay more for a tire doesn’t mean you will get higher mileage and more retreads.

When it comes to tires, the only way to determine what’s best for you is to test them for yourself. That means developing an on-going tire evaluation program—an extra step that can end up saving you significant dollars. You’ll be comparing the tires you currently run with a possible newcomer to your fleet.

At Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, when we test new tires for our Roadmaster brand commercial lines, we benchmark against tier 1 and tier 2 brands. Our tests are macro in scale and we run the same test with multiple fleets. We then compare the data to see how our tires stack up to the competition.

Unlike a tire company that is testing products day in and day out with dedicated technical professionals and sophisticated equipment, most fleets do not have the capability or bandwidth to conduct exhaustive testing. Yet, you can still do a valid evaluation within a fleet and get results that give you confidence in what to expect from selected tire brands.

Steer Tire Evaluation:

To conduct an apples-to-apples comparison, you need to keep all unnecessary variables out of the equation. You should run like-brand and like-model tractors or trucks, and they should be the same age with the same specs. In addition, drivers comparable in skill level should run the trucks. Drivers can impact tire performance in subtle ways. Routes and loads should be identical, or as similar as possible. Choose dedicated long-haul routes. Or, if you’re evaluating tires in a regional or local operation, choose similar types of service.

Once proper “like” equipment is identified, you’ll want to outfit four of the trucks with your new evaluation steer tire, and outfit another four with the steer tire you’re currently running. You’ll be doing a head-to-head analysis. There are two reasons to run at least four vehicles: 1. To get a good average wear rate considering any variation in vehicles, routes, or driver. 2. If you lose a tire due to a road hazard, you will still have three vehicles left running.

Drive Tire Evaluation:

Drive tires are somewhat easier to evaluate. Instead of pitting vehicles against each other, you can use one vehicle to test two brands of tires. The only caveat is that their diameters need to be within ¼-inch of each other. To put that into perspective, you can run one drive tire with 30/32nds of tread depth, and have the competing drive tire within plus or minus 4/32nds of that figure. Any larger variances will cause tire scrubbing and inaccurate results.

With this evaluation, you can run two trucks with eight wheel positions. The key is doing an X-pattern (or cross-axle) on the two rear axles. (Refer to TMC RP230B “Tire Test Procedures for Tread Wear, Serviceability and Fuel Economy) However, don’t run the tires identically on the two trucks—the right rear outer tire historically wears faster than any other drive position tire and that’s because there is a higher percentage of right hand turns, which can cause scrubbing. So, be sure to have brand X in that position on one evaluation truck, and brand Y on the next truck. Also, note that tires on the trailing axle typically wear about 20 percent faster than the forward axle.

Trailer Tire Evaluation:

In the majority of cases, fleets will not buy new replacement trailer tires – they’ll retread an existing removed steer, drive or trailer tire, or move a drive tire to the trailer position.

But, if you have a very large fleet that buys a lot of new trailers and wants to compare two or more different tires, or if you have a fleet policy of not running retreads, then here’s how you can evaluate the tires:

Run at least two trailers for each tire design being evaluated and mount your evaluation tires in a cross-axle alignment – the same pattern as in a drive tire evaluation. Like with the drives, there should be no more than ¼-inch tread diameter difference. Since most fleets run a drop-and-hook operation with trailers, and typically have a 2-1 (or more) ratio of trailers to tractors, it can take a long time to gather data. So, unless you can run dedicated tractors and trailers in the evaluation process, it may not be worth your time. If you do pursue a tire evaluation on trailers, be sure to have hubometers installed to accurately track mileage.

Maintenance Practices:

Once tires are mounted, start the evaluation off properly by having each vehicle undergo a total vehicle alignment on the front and rear axles. Once that’s done, you should not have to do a re-alignment during the evaluation period unless you detect irregular wear, or have a suspension issue with a vehicle.

It’s important to have the drivers conduct proper pre-and post-trip inspections. And, that means tire inflation needs to be checked properly — not with a tire thumper. Tires need to be gauged to ensure tire inflation pressure is at the pre-defined level for the specific position. To make it easy on your drivers, install flow-through valve caps, so they don’t have to spend time taking off valve caps.

What’s more, drivers must keep their eyes (and fingers) on the tires to inspect for wear – a weekly fingertip diagnostic (simply running a hand over the tread) can detect signs of irregular wear. Should toe or feather wear be found, for example, it could mean an alignment problem, suspension problem, or bent tie rod.

If drivers detect early signs of irregular wear, your fleet can fix the underlying problem and continue with the evaluation. Be sure to keep record of any wear issues and vehicle adjustments.

Evaluation Periods:

Evaluation units should be checked every 30,000 miles, or every three months, whichever comes first. The first item to analyze is tread wear, and for this you need a quality tread depth gauge that measures to 1/32nd or 1 mm. Electronic gauges with digital readouts are easiest to read. When checking the tire, you should have three points for gauging across the tread face – the outside, middle and inside of the tread. Again, a fingertip diagnostic should be conducted as well and any signs of irregular wear reported. Irregular wear could indicate a problem with the vehicle, as mentioned earlier. If the irregular wear is found to be severe, in the drive or trailer position, rotate the tires on the front rear axle in cross axle design (for example, LRI & O to RFI & O). However, don’t rotate side-to-side.

Since deeper tread squirms, wear rates will be faster at the start of the evaluation, then level out toward the end.

Projecting Tread Wear

After six to nine months, or 75,000 miles, you should have solid wear data on your steer tires, which generally last between 90,000 and 150,000 miles. With this wear data in place, you can now make projections on how many more miles the steers will last before they’re pulled for retreading. This will give you an apples-to-apples mileage comparison and provide your first cost-per-mile figure on virgin rubber, once you factor in the purchase price.

Since drive tires can wear up to 350,000 miles or better, and trailer tires can offer mileage at 200,000 miles or better, a nine-month check should be a reliable indication of the future. With 90,000 miles under your belt, you should see how many 32nds of tread have been worn off.

Now that you have data on how much tread is worn on your tires, how do you make your calculations?

First, calculate tread wear rate. Tread wear rate = (current mileage – installation mileage)/(original tread depth – current tread depth). As an example, the first test truck’s current mileage is 390,000 miles and tires were installed at 300,000 miles. The original tread depth was 30/32nds and the current depth is 24/32nds. So, 6/32nds were worn off. Thus, the wear rate is 90,000 miles divided by 6, or 15,000 miles per 32nd .

Next, calculate projected miles to removal. You’ll need the original tread depth of the tire, and the pull tread depth. For drive positions, the pull depth is normally 4/32nds, and in our example, the evaluation drive had 30/32nds of tread. Projected total miles to removal = wear rate x (original tread depth – pull point tread depth). In our example, 15,000 x 26 = 390,000 miles.

In our work, we’ve found that tires have a better than 80 percent chance to run out to these projections.

Casings and Retreads

With projected mileage in hand, the next step is to understand and get a feel for the tire’s next life. And, that’s retreading.

If time weren’t a factor, you could run a full-blown evaluation getting true mileage figures on your evaluation tires, plus the number of times the tire could be retreaded. This is cradle-to-grave documentation, which is good to maintain as part of normal operations. But, that means years, lots of them, to gain quantifiable data.

Instead, we recommend two things:

First: Look at the warranty on your evaluation tire and compare it against the tire you’re currently running. The manufacturer should offer a casing warranty in the event that the tire is not retreadable for certain reasons. The warranties typically range from four to seven years from the date of manufacture, and offer casing credits ranging from about $40 to $130 on the “first” retread. Most manufacturers also offer a reduced casing credit for the second retread. This warranty comparison should give you a feel for what you should expect when it comes to retreading.

Second: Talk with your tire dealer or retreader and ask about retreadability of the evaluation tires compared to your current tires. The retreader may give you actual rejection rates for the two brands (also known as RAR or “returned as received”). Also, ask them what they will pay for a virgin casing of each brand.

Your tire dealer may also be able to refer you to other fleets that are running the tires you are considering. You could ask them what they’re experiencing in retreadability. What you learn may sway your decision once your “original tread” cost-per-mile is determined.

Determining Cost-Per-Mile

You have your data, now you can crunch some numbers. The original tire cost-per-mile is a simple calculation. Take the purchase price of your evaluation tire and divide by your projected mileage. As an example, you may be paying $400 for your evaluation drive tire and your projected mileage is 390,000 miles. So, divide your cost by the mileage and you come up with $0.001026 per mile. If your current tire costs $600, and it projected to deliver 10 percent more mileage or 429,000 miles, you’d be at $0.001399 per mile. So, even if your evaluation tire didn’t outperform the incumbent tire in mileage, it did best it in cost-per-mile, and that’s the metric that’s most important.

Next, factor-in what you found on retreading. Here’s how to calculate retreads: (Purchase price of new tire – virgin casing value)/(Tire mileage)

This sample calculation gives you the cost-per-mile of the tread rubber.

Take your purchase price and subtract the retread casing value, then divide the result by your mileage. For example, if you paid $400 for the tire and had a virgin casing value of $90, your net cost would be $310. If you received 390,000 miles on that drive tire, your cost-per-mile of tread would be $0.000795.

After the Evaluation:

If your evaluation tire outperformed the incumbent, as in our example above, do you make a wholesale change in up-fitting your equipment? Our recommendation is to move forward, but not all the way forward. If you have followed through properly, you have completed a very important evaluation, which now gives you confidence in the new tire and how it should outperform the incumbent. It won’t take long to see the proof on a grander scale. So, begin to purchase 50 percent of the “new” tires for six months – both in replacement and through your truck OE if available—and then at a year, move forward on full-tire standardization.

It is my hope that this information has been helpful as you work to assess the various tire options you have available with an eye to reducing costs over the long term. While it takes time and effort to conduct your own testing, it can be done and is well worth it as you seek to gain a competitive edge for your fleet. 

More from Industry News

Volvo Group celebrates grand opening of DEX Heavy Duty Parts facility in Oklahoma City

DEX Heavy Duty Parts LLC, a Volvo Group subsidiary and leading supplier of recycled, renovated and surplus medium- and heavy-duty truck parts, has celebrated the grand opening of its new facility in Oklahoma City. The facility joins DEX's current facility in Advance, North Carolina to better serve owners of second- and third-generation trucks with recycled and renovated parts.

The Heico Companies LLC. acquires Shred-Tech Corporation

The Heico Companies, L.L.C. ("Heico") has announced that it has completed the acquisition of a majority interest in Shred-Tech Corporation, a market leader in the design and manufacture of mobile and stationary shredding equipment for the document destruction and recycling industries. Based in Cambridge, ON, Shred-Tech also has operations in the U.S., U.K. and Thailand. Heico has partnered in the acquisition with Rob Glass, Shred-Tech's President and CEO, who will continue to lead the Company.

Plastics industry applauds Ontario government move to producer responsibility for packaging, paper and plastics

The Canadian Plastics Industry Association (CPIA) and its members applaud today's announcement by the Honourable Jeff Yurek, Ontario's Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks, directing the transition of Ontario's Blue Box residential recycling program to a producer responsibility model by 2025. Today, the Blue Box program is funded equally by municipalities and industry. Once the transition is complete, industry will manage 100% of the costs of the Blue Box system alleviating this burden from municipal taxpayers.

New Poll: Despite uncertainty over recycling, consumers aren't backing down

While headlines over the past few years might lead some to believe otherwise, the reality is that Americans say they are still recycling at the same rate, despite having little confidence that their recyclables actually get recycled. A national poll conducted by Mason-Dixon on behalf of the U.S. based Carton Council showed that 85% of respondents report they recycle.

US objects to new global rules to better control exports of contaminated and mixed plastic waste

The US is the sole member of the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) -- the group of 36 developed nations, that has chosen to object to the adoption of recently agreed Basel Convention trade controls to ensure that plastic wastes that are dirty and mixed and thus difficult to recycle can only be exported with the prior permission of the importing country.

Subscribe to our free newsletter

Get our newsletter

Learn more

Astec Industries appoints new CEO and president

Astec Industries, Inc. has appointed Barry Ruffalo as its President and Chief Executive Officer to be effective on August 12, 2019. Ruffalo has also been elected to the Board of Directors. Ruffalo will join the Board of Directors as a Class I director and will stand for re-election at the Company's 2020 annual meeting. On the effective date of Ruffalo's appointment, Richard Dorris, Interim Chief Executive Officer, will resume his role as Chief Operating Officer.

merQbiz introduces BaleVision - a solution for optimizing paper recovery

merQbiz, a solutions and analytics provider for buyers and sellers in the recovered paper (RCP) industry, introduces BaleVision, providing companies actionable insights into their RCP quality. Combining a leading quality assessment tool with comprehensive data, BaleVision helps RCP buyers maximize supplier performance and sellers earn a fair price for their product.

Superior appoints Belterra to distribution role in Quebec

Superior Industries, Inc., the U.S. based manufacturer and global supplier of bulk material processing and handling systems, has announced a new partnership with Canada's largest distributor of conveyor belting, components and other bulk material handling solutions. Belterra, a 50-year-old distributor with 19 locations throughout the country, will stock, sell and service Superior's conveyor idlers, pulleys, scrapers and accessories in Quebec. 

Don't put bullets, batteries or bear spray on the curb

Recycle BC is sounding the alarm over the rising number of explosive and hazardous materials British Columbia residents are placing in the province's residential packaging and paper recycling. BC's major recycling collectors and processors have seen seven fires in 2019, with several of them having endangered lives and forced the temporary closure of facilities.

Canadian government to invest $20 million in Gerdau Ameristeel

July 26, Jennifer O'Connell, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance (Youth Economic Opportunity), on behalf of the Honourable Navdeep Bains, Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development, announced a $20-million investment in an $81.2-million project that will help Gerdau Ameristeel upgrade its facilities in Whitby and Cambridge, Ontario. The investment will modernize steel production lines, reduce manufacturing costs, reduce the amount of scrap metal going to landfills and improve production capability for billets, which are semi-finished long steel products used to produce other steel-based products such as angles, rebar, flats or channels. The investment will also create 108 jobs and maintain 710 more in Whitby and Cambridge.

CCREF announces three scholarship winners

The Composting Council Research & Education Foundation's (CCREF) Board of Trustees has announce the winners of this year's Compost Research Scholarship program.  Two students were awarded national scholarships and one student was chosen to receive a special scholarship for North Carolina college students funded by a donation from the North Carolina Composting Council (NCCC). The CCREF is associated with the US Composting Council.

Waste Connections names Worthing Jackman as President and CEO

 Waste Connections, Inc. has announced the appointment of Worthing F. Jackman, the Company's President, to President and Chief Executive Officer.  He has also joined Waste Connections' Board of Directors.  In addition, the company announced that Ronald J. Mittelstaedt has returned from his temporary leave of absence and assumed the role of Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors.  As Executive Chairman and as a continuing employee, Mr. Mittelstaedt will assist in several areas, including culture, strategy and mergers and acquisitions. 

Subscribe to our free magazine

Get Our Magazine

Paper or Digital delivered monthly to you

Subscribe or Renew Learn more

Joe Borsellino and Peter Daley appointed to Call2Recycle Canada’s board of directors

Call2Recycle Canada, Inc. has announced the appointment of two new members to its Board of Directors: Joe Borsellino and Peter Daley.  Each brings extensive industry experience and valuable perspectives to the board, strengthening Call2Recycle's leadership as regulated product stewardship becomes a key provincial strategy for achieving waste management and environmental goals.

Canada called upon to finally sign pact to stop dumping waste in developing countries

In a letter to Ms. Catherine McKenna, Canada's Minister of Environment and Climate Change, several leading Canadian and Global environmental organizations, are calling on Canada to ratify the Basel Ban Amendment -- a 1995 pact known as the Ban Amendment which would amend the Basel Convention to require developed countries to cease exporting hazardous and other wastes to developing countries for any reason. Canada has ratified the Basel Convention but not the Amendment.

How to start a corporate waste diversion program

Today, corporations stand at the forefront of the sustainability movement. Amid worldwide recycling and waste management struggles driven by restrictive legislation, new programs and innovations continue to emerge that help businesses reduce their waste output. Investors want to see companies reporting on successful sustainability efforts. Incoming generations of consumers and the next wave of the workforce increasingly want to put their money and labor behind companies working to stem the threat of climate change. Strong business models now must include waste diversion programs, a corporate strategy that redirects waste from landfills.

New coalition launches to advocate for consumer-focused solutions to California’s recycling challenges

Californians for Recycling and the Environment today announced the formal launch of its coalition, whose purpose is to bring together Californians, product manufacturers and lawmakers to find an effective, environmentally responsible, consumer-focused solution to reduce the amount of plastic waste that goes into California's landfills and litters the environment.

Bunting Magnetics celebrating 60 years in business

On August 3rd, 2019, Bunting Magnetics Co. will be celebrating its 60th anniversary as a company. Bunting Magnetics Co. is an industry leader in the design, manufacture, and sales of cutting-edge magnetic equipment used in applications such as magnetic separation, metal detection, conveyor systems, and magnetic printing cylinders. The main industries the company serves include the food and pharmaceutical industries, plastics, recycling, mining, printing, manufacturing, automotive, chemical, ceramics, textiles, and more.

GFL files registration statement and preliminary prospectus for initial public offering

GFL Environmental Inc. (together with GFL Environmental Holdings Inc., "GFL") announced last week the filing of a registration statement on Form F-1 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and a preliminary base PREP prospectus with the securities regulatory authorities in each of the provinces and territories of Canada ("Canadian Regulators") for a proposed initial public offering ("IPO") of subordinate voting shares concurrently in the United States and Canada. The number of shares to be offered and the price range for the IPO have not yet been determined.

Subscribe to our free newsletter

Get our newsletter

Learn more

Fontaine to offer Lytx video telematics pre-wire packages for major truck brands

Lytx ®, a leading provider of video telematics, analytics, safety and operational efficiency solutions for commercial and public sector fleets, today announced that Fontaine Modification will offer pre-wiring packages for Lytx fleet solutions on major truck brands including Ford, Hino, International, Volvo, Freightliner and Kenworth. Fontaine is North America's most comprehensive provider of post-production truck modification services for OEMs, dealers and fleets. 

Sierra Recycling & Demolition celebrates 60 years

Celebrating their 60th year of commitment and service to their customers and the recycling industry, Sierra Recycling & Demolition was started by Ben Sacco in 1959. Now the sister company of Sierra International Machinery, the California-based recycling equipment specialist, Sierra has deep roots in recycling, and they have for 60 years. Based on this foundation, Sierra International Machinery states: "Our equipment is designed by recyclers for recyclers. At Sierra, we have the same experiences and challenges that other recyclers have, and we know the problems and the issues other recyclers face. We use the experiences from Sierra Recycling and Demolition, our engineers, operation managers, and service technicians to produce superior machines that we actively use in our own yard."

World’s first zero waste adventure kicking off in Yellowstone National Park

Beginning July 6, 2019, America's first national park will be the setting for another historic innovation: the World's First Zero Waste Adventure, created by Natural Habitat Adventures (Nat Hab). Kicking off in Bozeman, MT and moving through the northern region of Yellowstone National Park this first-ever waste-conscious endeavor will attempt to divert (refuse, recycle, compost, upcycle, or re-use) 99 percent or more of all waste produced as part of Nat Hab-sponsored trip operations.* Fourteen travellers will participate, guided by two naturalist Expedition Leaders.

Enerkem remembers Vincent Chornet

The management of Enerkem is sad to announce the passing of Enerkem Cofounder and Executive Chairman Vincent Chornet at the age of 45, following a prolonged illness. Faithful to himself, he fought this terrible disease with the passion and determination that we know him for. He has been active even in the last moments, exchanging emails last week with different members of his team. In recent months, he has continued to chair Enerkem's Board of Directors, with the best interests of the company at heart.

Moore & Associates remembers Jerry Rose, 50-year paper and recycling industry veteran

Jerry Rose, 84, of Stamford, CT, passed away peacefully on Saturday, June 22, 2019 surrounded by his loving family. A 50-year veteran of the paper and recycling industries, Jerry was a respected expert in the business and held several senior management positions before becoming a consultant. Jerry was a legend in the industry, with a wealth of knowledge and friends in every corner of the business. 

Subscribe to our free magazine

Get Our Magazine

Paper or Digital delivered monthly to you

Subscribe or Renew Learn more